Court-Appointed Attorneys and Immunity : Ferri v. Ackerman.
Discusses the Supreme Court decision in Ferri v. Ackerman, which ruled that an attorney appointed by a Federal judge to represent an indigent defendent in a criminal trial is not entitled under the Criminal Justice Act of 1964 to absolute immunity in a State malpractice action.
| Corporate Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
[publisher not identified],
1980.
|
| Series: | U.S. Congressional Research.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to the full text of this electronic book |
Internet
Connect to the full text of this electronic bookAvailable Online
| Call Number: |
CRS-1980-AML-0003 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Call Number | Status | Get It |
| CRS-1980-AML-0003 | Available | |