The actual art of governing : Justice Robert H. Jackson's concurring opinion in the steel seizure case /
"Justice Robert H. Jackson's concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. Sawyer (also called the Steel Seizure Case) is widely considered one of the greatest judicial opinions ever written. In Youngstown, the Supreme Court held that President Harry S. Truman acted illegally by se...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York, NY :
Oxford University Press,
[2025]
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to the full text of this electronic book |
| Summary: | "Justice Robert H. Jackson's concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. Sawyer (also called the Steel Seizure Case) is widely considered one of the greatest judicial opinions ever written. In Youngstown, the Supreme Court held that President Harry S. Truman acted illegally by seizing the nation's steel mills during the Korean War to avert a strike that would shut down production. Justice Jackson's separate opinion agreeing with that decision is now the authoritative source on the constitutional boundary between congressional and executive authority and is the spine of many leading cases such as United States v. Nixon and Trump v. United States"-- Provided by publisher. |
|---|---|
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (unpaged) : illustrations |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9780197768563 0197768563 9780197768556 0197768555 |