Courts and LGBTQ+ rights in an age of judicial retrenchment /
A comparative study of the United States, India, and Hong Kong, this book explores how courts often use LGBTQ+ rights to demonstrate their rhetorical commitment to liberal and global constitutionalism, even as their judgments fall short of, or even undermine, those ideals.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford, United Kingdom ; New York, NY :
Oxford University Press,
[2025]
|
| Series: | Oxford comparative constitutionalism.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to the full text of this electronic book |
Table of Contents:
- Setting the Scene
- Structure of the Book
- Theoretical Framework and Methodology
- Background
- Scholarly Contribution
- Case Selection and Methodology
- Scope and Limitations
- LGBTQ+ Rights, Culture Wars, and Polarization in the United States
- The Gradual Recognition of LGBTQ+ Rights (1986-2015)
- LGBTQ+ Rights in the Context of Two Culture Wars
- Polarization, Trump, and the Makings of Partisan Supreme Court
- LGBTQ+ Rights in the Second Roberts Court (2018-23)
- Conclusion: Institutional Self-Preservation v. Partisan Decision-Making
- LGBTQ+ Rights Amid Institutional Crises and Rising Ethnonationalism in India
- LGBTQ+ Rights in an Era of Transition (2001-14)
- The Shift in Indian Constitutionalism under Modi (2014-19)
- Privacy and the Decriminalization of Same-Sex Relations
- An Institution in Crisis and a Shift on LGBTQ+ Rights (2019-23)
- Conclusion: Institutional and Reputational Self-Preservation
- LGBTQ+ Rights, Economic Freedom, and the Remaining Fragments of Liberal Constitutionalism in Hong Kong
- Constitutional Adjudication under "One Country, Two Systems" (1997-2019)
- Developing a Progressive LGBTQ+ Rights Jurisprudence (2006-19)
- From Hybrid to Authoritarian (2019-21)
- LGBTQ+ Rights in Authoritarian Hong Kong
- Conclusion: An Uneasy Truce
- The Exceptionalism of LGBTQ+ Rights
- From Progressive to Self-Preserving
- The Changing Audiences for LGBTQ+ Rights Judgments
- Pinkwashing or Necessary Adaptation?
- The Future of LGBTQ+ Rights and Liberal Constitutionalism.