http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-2.xsd
Anyone interested in the study of attention will have had some exposure to the work of Anne Treisman. Anne Treisman has been one of the most influential cognitive psychologists in the last 50 years. Her research and theoretical insights have influenced a variety of disciplines, including vision sciences, auditory sciences, cognitive psychology, cognitive neurosciences, philosophy, psychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology. She is best known for her work on attention. Early in her career, much of that work involved auditory stimuli. Her later work has been primarily in the realm of visual attention. She has been especially concerned with the interactions among visual perception, attention, and memory as they relate to conscious and unconscious experience. Her Feature Integration Theory has been one of the organizing ideas in the field for three decades. While still a graduate student at Oxford, she helped launch the modern study of attention. In the present volume, several of her most influential papers are reprinted (including some of the harder to find early work). To accompany these reprints, the editors invited experts to comment and/or to show how their own work had been shaped by Treisman's ideas and findings. The result is a scientifically rich ride through the world of ideas inspired by Treisman's work. The contributed chapters include discussions of auditory and visual attention, the role of features in selection, parallel and serial processing, and automaticity. They describe the roots and evolution of Feature Integration Theory and related models like Guided Search. They explore the interactions of attention and perception at the cognitive, neuropsychological, and biological levels. Readers can consider the critical role of binding in perception, the role of attention in scene perception, as well as the influence of cognitive load, memory, reflection, and perceptual learning on early and late processing. They will see how methods to study conscious perceptual awareness have evolved over the years.
Cover; Contents; Contributors; Article: (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76(3), 282-299; 1. A research agenda for 40 years and counting: Strategies and models of selective attention (1969); Article: (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242-248; Article: (1973). Divided attention to ear and eye. In S. Kornblum (Ed.) Attention and Performance IV, Academic Press, 101-117; 2. Focused and Divided Attention to the Eyes and Ears: A Research Journey.
Article: (1967). Selective attention: perception or response? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 19(1): 1-173. From the Mother Lode to Load; Article: (1962). Binocular rivalry and stereoscopic depth perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 23-37; 4. Binocular Rivalry and Stereopsis Revisited; Article: (1980). feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136; 5. Establishing the field: Treisman and Gelade (1980); Article: (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
6. FIT: Foundation for an Integrative TheoryArticle: (1988). The Features and objects: Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A (2) 201-237; 7. Some Reflections on the Processing of Perceptual Features; Article: (1984). Emergent features, attention and object perception, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 12-21; 8. Emergent Features, Gestalts, and Feature Integration Theory; Article: (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology., 14, 107-141.
9. At the Core of Feature Integration Theory: On Treisman and Schmidt (1982)Article: (1992). Automaticity and preattentive processing. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 341-362; 10. Perceptual Learning and Memory in Visual Search; Article: 1996. Object tokens, attention, and visual memory. In T. Inui and J. McClelland (Eds.) Attention and Performance XVI: Information Integration in Perception and Communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 15-46; 11. Plasticity, Competition, and Task Effects in Object Perception.
Article: 2006. How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Congnition, 14, 411-44312. Reciprocal Effects of Attention and Perception: On Anne Treisman's "How the Deployment of Attention Determines What We See"; 13. Distributed Attention and Its Implication For Visual Perception; Article: (1997). The interaction of spatial and object pathways: Evidence from Balint's syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 295-3; 14. Spatial Deficits and Feature Integration Theory; 15. There's binding and there's binding, or is there just binding? Neuropsychological insights from Bálint's syndrome.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Oxford : Oxford University Press, USA, 2012