Cover Image

Framing prior consultation in Brazil ethnographic perspectives on limits of participation and multicultural politics /

Bibliographic Details
Format: Thesis eBook
Language:English
Published: Bielefeld : Transcript, [2018].
Series:Kultur und soziale Praxis.
Subjects:
Indigenous peoples > Legal status, laws, etc.
Minorities > Legal status, laws, etc.
Electronic books.
Online Access:Connect to the full text of this electronic book
Table of Contents:
  • Machine generated contents note: I. Presentation of the work and contexts for the regulation of prior consultation in Brazil
  • 1. Introduction
  • 1.1. Problem of study, research questions and theoretical positioning
  • 1.2. Methods and data of this study
  • 1.3. Structure of this work
  • 2. Facets of prior consultation
  • building a theoretical toolkit
  • 2.1. Interpretive approaches to legal anthropology
  • 2.2. Legal pluralism and the anthropology of human rights
  • 2.3. judicialization of politics
  • 2.4. Participation
  • 2.5. Multiculturalist politics
  • 3. Methods
  • 3.1. Access to the field and places of research
  • 3.2. Gathering and processing field data
  • 4. Historic contexts for debating prior consultation in Brazil
  • 4.1. International Labour Organisation and indigenous peoples
  • 4.2. From Convention 107 to Convention 169
  • 4.3. ILO and participatory rights in Brazil until 2012
  • II. Actors' and observers' perspectives on the process of legal regulation in Brazil
  • 5. Representatives of the right holders in the regulation
  • 5.1. Indigenous organizations: COIAB & APIB
  • 5.2. National Coordination of Quilombola Communities
  • CONAQ
  • 5.3. Traditional peoples' representatives
  • the CNPCT
  • 5.4. Strategies of the subjects of rights and their representatives
  • 6. Interministerial Working Group (GTI)
  • the legislators
  • 6.1. Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME)
  • 6.2. National Indian Foundation (FUNAI)
  • 6.3. Palmares Cultural Foundation (FCP)
  • 6.4. Special Secretariat for the Promotion of Racial Equality (SEPPIR)
  • 6.5. National Department for Transport Infrastructure (DNIT)
  • 6.6. Ministry of the Environment (MMA)
  • 6.7. General Secretariat of the Presidency (SGPR) Head of the Working Group
  • 6.8. Actors, arenas, discourses
  • 7. Civil society actors
  • two NGOs
  • 7.1. Catholic Indigenist Missionary Council (CIMI)
  • 7.2. Instituto Socioambiental
  • (ISA)
  • 7.3. Between cooperation and resistance: strategies of the civil society organizations
  • 8. Observers: international, national & disciplinary experts
  • 8.1. International observers: ILO and the OAS
  • 8.2. National legal experts: The Office of the Federal Public Prosecutor (MPF)
  • 8.3. Brazilian anthropologists
  • the disciplinary experts
  • 8.4. Spreading information and mediating rights
  • III. Discussion and Conclusions
  • 9. Discussion I: The implementation of law
  • 9.1. Competing discourses on frames for prior consultation in Brazil
  • 9.2. Interlegality and vernacularizers in the regulation process
  • 9.3. Juridical and political processes as different ways of managing the dispute on prior consultation
  • 10. Discussion II: Prior consultation in Brazil
  • 10.1. practicalities of participation
  • 10.2. Interweaving of law, anthropology and multiculturalist politics in the right to prior consultation
  • 11. Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • A. List of Abbreviations.