Contemporary Legal Issues. Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements /
A panel discusses the background and history of Arbitration in employment law; specifically Federal Arbitration Act 1925 and California Arbitration Statute (1927, 1961); how Arbitration works: the advantages and disadvantages - time, cost, privacy, no jury trial, limited discovery and appeals; how a...
| Other Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Video |
| Language: | English |
| Language Notes: | In English. |
| Published: |
San Marcos, CA :
Palomar Community College,
2005.
|
| Series: | Criminal justice and public safety in video.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to this streaming video (Alexander Street Press) |
| Summary: | A panel discusses the background and history of Arbitration in employment law; specifically Federal Arbitration Act 1925 and California Arbitration Statute (1927, 1961); how Arbitration works: the advantages and disadvantages - time, cost, privacy, no jury trial, limited discovery and appeals; how an Arbitrator is selected; collective bargaining issues; union/management relationships; resolution of grievances/quid pro quo for a no-strike clause; the EEOC's position on mandatory arbitration agreements; SAIC's application model; and the validity of the agreements and the requirements to enforce arbitration agreements. One example given is Alexander v. Gardner-Denver. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Title from resource description page (viewed August 11, 2015). |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (29 min.) |
| Playing Time: | 00:28:25 |