Does Compulsory Licensing Work as an Effective Antitrust Tool?.

Innovation is very important for economic growth and, often, small start-ups are a key generator of innovation. For this, access to patents is essential for innovative start-ups. However, a few dominant companies often hold these patents in a market field and refuse to license their technology to ot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Video
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Latest Thinking, [date of publication not identified]
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this streaming video (Alexander Street Press)
Description
Summary:Innovation is very important for economic growth and, often, small start-ups are a key generator of innovation. For this, access to patents is essential for innovative start-ups. However, a few dominant companies often hold these patents in a market field and refuse to license their technology to others, as MONIKA SCHNITZER explains in this video. She has investigated whether antitrust measures, such as compulsory licensing, are an effective tool to deal with this problem. Using the 1956 consent decree as a case study, her team examined whether the compulsory licensing measures imposed on the Bell System - a monopolistic provider of telecommunications services in the United States in the 1950s - promoted follow-on innovation. Indeed, the researchers found that it worked in fields outside of telecommunications, but not so much inside Bell's own market field. Analyzing the reasons for this, this empirical study demonstrates that compulsory licensing can be an effective antitrust remedy under certain conditions.
Item Description:Title from resource description page (viewed August 24, 2020).
Physical Description:1 online resource (12 minutes)
Playing Time:00:11:51