http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-2.xsd
Sustainable slope stabilization using recycled plastic pins
"Landslides and slope failure are common in US and rest of the world. The landslides cause significant damage to infrastructure and requires millions of dollars each year to fix the slope. A sustainable and cost effective option can have significant benefits, as it will reduce the maintenance cost as well as may help the environment. Recycled plastic pins are made from recycled plastic bottles and other plastic waste. This book outlines the technique of sustainable slope stabilization using recycled plastic pins, outlining design techniques and aided by several case studies"--
Cover ; Half title ; Dedication ; Title ; Copyright ; Table of contents; Preface; About the authors; 1 Introduction; 2 Slope failure and stabilisation methods; 2.1 Slope failure; 2.2 Shallow slope failure; 2.3 Variation of shear strength of highly plastic clay soil; 2.4 Effect of rainfall on slope stability; 2.5 Methods of repair of shallow slope failures; 2.5.1 Slope rebuilding; 2.5.2 Pipe piles and wood lagging; 2.5.3 Geosynthetic/geogrid repair; 2.5.4 Soil-cement repair; 2.5.5 Repair with launched soil nails; 2.5.6 Earth anchors; 2.5.7 Geofoam; 2.5.8 Wick drains; 2.5.9 Retaining wall.
2.5.9.1 Low masonry or concrete walls2.5.9.2 Gabion walls; 2.5.9.3 Shallow mechanically stabilised earth walls; 2.5.10 Pin piles (micropiles); 2.5.11 Slender piles; 2.5.12 Plate piles; 2.5.13 Recycled plastic pins; 3 Generation and recycling of plastics; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Generation of plastic waste; 3.2.1 Global scene; 3.2.2 US perspective ; 3.3 Management of plastic waste; 3.3.1 Global scene; 3.3.2 US perspective; 3.3.3 Potential benefits of recycling plastic waste; 3.4 Use of recycled plastics in different applications.
3.5 Use of recycled plastic for manufacture of recycled plastic pins4 Recycled plastic pins; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Manufacturing process of RPPs; 4.3 Engineering properties of RPPs; 4.3.1 Compressive and tensile strength; 4.3.2 Flexural strength; 4.3.3 Effect of weathering on long-term properties; 4.3.4 Creep of RPPs; 4.3.4.1 Creep of RPPs in slope stabilisation; 4.4 Effect of environmental conditions; 5 Design methods; 5.1 Design methods; 5.2 Limit state design method; 5.3 Performance-based design approach; 5.3.1 Limit failure of soil adjacent to RPPs; 5.3.2 Limit resistance of RPPs.
5.3.2.1 Limit horizontal displacement of RPPs5.3.2.2 Limit maximum flexure for prolonged creep life; 5.4 Determination of limit soil pressure; 5.4.1 Calculation of limit soil pressure; 5.4.2 Calculation of limit soil resistance; 5.5 Limit horizontal displacement and maximum flexure of RPPs; 5.6 Finalising the design chart; 5.7 Calculation of factor of safety; 5.7.1 Approach 1: conventional method of slices; 5.7.1.1 Design steps for approach 1; 5.7.2 Approach 2: infinite slope; 5.7.2.1 Design steps for approach 2; 5.8 Design recommendations; 5.8.1 Extent of reinforcement zone.
5.8.2 Material selection5.8.3 Selection of RPP spacing; 5.8.4 Minimum RPP length and RPP sections; 5.8.5 Recommendations on design method; 6 Construction methods; 6.1 Early development of construction techniques ; 6.2 Types of equipment and driving tools for field installation; 6.2.1 Davey Kent DK 100B drilling rig; 6.2.2 Klemm 802 drill rig with KD 1011 percussion head drifter; 6.2.3 Deere 200D with FRD F22 hydraulic hammer; 6.2.4 Caterpillar CAT 320D LRR with CAT H130S hydraulic hammer; 6.3 Field installation rate; 6.4 Potential challenges of RPP installation; 6.4.1 Slope steepness.
Sahadat Hossain, the University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA, Sadik Khan, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA, Golam Kibria, Drash Consultants, LLC, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
The Netherlands ; Boca Raton : CRC Press/Balkema, [2017]