Contracts and finality of signature : the Coys of Kensington case /
A signed contract is binding on the parties. The principle was first formulated in L'Estrange v F Graucob, Ltd.1 It is a case from the 1930s. Over the past few decades, forms have become elaborate. Numerous aspects and effects arise concerning signing such documents. Coys of Kensington Automobi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
London :
Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad,
2020.
|
| Series: | SAGE business cases.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to the full text of this electronic book |
| Summary: | A signed contract is binding on the parties. The principle was first formulated in L'Estrange v F Graucob, Ltd.1 It is a case from the 1930s. Over the past few decades, forms have become elaborate. Numerous aspects and effects arise concerning signing such documents. Coys of Kensington Automobiles Limited v Tiziana Pugliese explores, elaborates, and settles the theme.2 A person who has signed a contract may still escape it on the grounds of misrepresentation. We explore this as a postscript to the case of Peekay Intermark Ltd vs. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd.3 The case can be used in a course on business law and courses, and executive development programs on contracts, sales and project management. |
|---|---|
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource. |
| ISBN: | 9781529619935 1529619939 |