APA (7th ed.) Citation

Pennsylvania, United States. Supreme Court, Prigg, E., & Peters, R. (1842). Report of the case of Edward Prigg against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, at January term, 1842: In which it was decided that all the laws of the several states relative to fugitive slaves are unconstitutional and void, and that Congress have the exclusive power of legislation on the subject of fugitive slaves escaping into other states. Stereotyped by L. Johnson.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Pennsylvania, United States. Supreme Court, Edward Prigg, and Richard Peters. Report of the Case of Edward Prigg Against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, at January Term, 1842: In Which It Was Decided That All the Laws of the Several States Relative to Fugitive Slaves Are Unconstitutional and Void, and That Congress Have the Exclusive Power of Legislation on the Subject of Fugitive Slaves Escaping into Other States. Philadelphia: Stereotyped by L. Johnson, 1842.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Pennsylvania, et al. Report of the Case of Edward Prigg Against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, at January Term, 1842: In Which It Was Decided That All the Laws of the Several States Relative to Fugitive Slaves Are Unconstitutional and Void, and That Congress Have the Exclusive Power of Legislation on the Subject of Fugitive Slaves Escaping into Other States. Stereotyped by L. Johnson, 1842.

Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.