R. S & Crofton, Z. (1663). Jerubbaal justified: or, A plain rebuke of the high (pretended humble) remonstrance and plea against Mr. Crofton his reformation not separation: Or, a plea for communion with the church under those corruptions, and by that disorderly ministration, to which he cannot conform, nor by it administer. Demonstrating, T.P. (alias D.) his grosse mistakes of Mr. Crofton his principle and argument: as also the fallacie and vanity of his pleaded necessity for his (confessed) separation from publique assemblies, which is found insufficient to acquit him of schisme. To which is added a position, disputing the lawfulnesse of ministers receiving an imposed liturgy. [publisher not identified].
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationR. S and Zachary Crofton. Jerubbaal Justified: Or, A Plain Rebuke of the High (pretended Humble) Remonstrance and Plea Against Mr. Crofton His Reformation Not Separation: Or, a Plea for Communion with the Church Under Those Corruptions, and by That Disorderly Ministration, to Which He Cannot Conform, nor by It Administer. Demonstrating, T.P. (alias D.) His Grosse Mistakes of Mr. Crofton His Principle and Argument: As Also the Fallacie and Vanity of His Pleaded Necessity for His (confessed) Separation from Publique Assemblies, Which Is Found Insufficient to Acquit Him of Schisme. To Which Is Added a Position, Disputing the Lawfulnesse of Ministers Receiving an Imposed Liturgy. London: [publisher not identified], 1663.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationR. S and Zachary Crofton. Jerubbaal Justified: Or, A Plain Rebuke of the High (pretended Humble) Remonstrance and Plea Against Mr. Crofton His Reformation Not Separation: Or, a Plea for Communion with the Church Under Those Corruptions, and by That Disorderly Ministration, to Which He Cannot Conform, nor by It Administer. Demonstrating, T.P. (alias D.) His Grosse Mistakes of Mr. Crofton His Principle and Argument: As Also the Fallacie and Vanity of His Pleaded Necessity for His (confessed) Separation from Publique Assemblies, Which Is Found Insufficient to Acquit Him of Schisme. To Which Is Added a Position, Disputing the Lawfulnesse of Ministers Receiving an Imposed Liturgy. [publisher not identified], 1663.