APA (7th ed.) Citation

Garrett, W. (1699). A persuasive to the study of the Revelation, or, An exposition of the three first verses of that prophecy: Wherein 1. There is an account given of the unintelligibleness of the Revelation ... 2. Dr. Hammond's key ... shewn to be a mistaken one. 3. That neither the Doctor himself, nor anyone else in his time, understood the meaning of those passages. 4. That it can proceed from no better cause than injudiciousness or unskilfulness in these mysteries, to take exceptions at our modern Protestant expositions of the Revelation upon the account of novelty. Printed March, 1698/9, and are to be had (with the rest of the authors tracts) at W. Dotchen's, bookseller ....

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Garrett, Walter. A Persuasive to the Study of the Revelation, or, An Exposition of the Three First Verses of That Prophecy: Wherein 1. There Is an Account Given of the Unintelligibleness of the Revelation ... 2. Dr. Hammond's Key ... Shewn to Be a Mistaken One. 3. That Neither the Doctor Himself, nor Anyone Else in His Time, Understood the Meaning of Those Passages. 4. That It Can Proceed from No Better Cause than Injudiciousness or Unskilfulness in These Mysteries, to Take Exceptions at Our Modern Protestant Expositions of the Revelation upon the Account of Novelty. London: Printed March, 1698/9, and are to be had (with the rest of the authors tracts) at W. Dotchen's, bookseller ..., 1699.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Garrett, Walter. A Persuasive to the Study of the Revelation, or, An Exposition of the Three First Verses of That Prophecy: Wherein 1. There Is an Account Given of the Unintelligibleness of the Revelation ... 2. Dr. Hammond's Key ... Shewn to Be a Mistaken One. 3. That Neither the Doctor Himself, nor Anyone Else in His Time, Understood the Meaning of Those Passages. 4. That It Can Proceed from No Better Cause than Injudiciousness or Unskilfulness in These Mysteries, to Take Exceptions at Our Modern Protestant Expositions of the Revelation upon the Account of Novelty. Printed March, 1698/9, and are to be had (with the rest of the authors tracts) at W. Dotchen's, bookseller ..., 1699.

Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.