APA (7th ed.) Citation

Everard, R. (1652). Natures vindication, or, A check to all those who affirm nature to be vile, wicked, corrupt, and sinful: [handled] 1. in eight scripture arguments, 2. the opposers main objections answered, 3. a distinction between humane and divine nature, 4. natures inability to attain spiritual things without God's free gift, 5. the excellent use of this doctrine : in point of [brace] 1. prayer, 2. preaching, 3. magistracy, 4. war [brace] : then how prejudicial is the contrary doctrine to all? Printed for the author, and are to be sold by W. Larnar ....

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Everard, Robert. Natures Vindication, or, A Check to All Those Who Affirm Nature to Be Vile, Wicked, Corrupt, and Sinful: [handled] 1. in Eight Scripture Arguments, 2. the Opposers Main Objections Answered, 3. a Distinction Between Humane and Divine Nature, 4. Natures Inability to Attain Spiritual Things Without God's Free Gift, 5. the Excellent Use of This Doctrine : In Point of [brace] 1. Prayer, 2. Preaching, 3. Magistracy, 4. War [brace] : Then How Prejudicial Is the Contrary Doctrine to All? London: Printed for the author, and are to be sold by W. Larnar ..., 1652.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Everard, Robert. Natures Vindication, or, A Check to All Those Who Affirm Nature to Be Vile, Wicked, Corrupt, and Sinful: [handled] 1. in Eight Scripture Arguments, 2. the Opposers Main Objections Answered, 3. a Distinction Between Humane and Divine Nature, 4. Natures Inability to Attain Spiritual Things Without God's Free Gift, 5. the Excellent Use of This Doctrine : In Point of [brace] 1. Prayer, 2. Preaching, 3. Magistracy, 4. War [brace] : Then How Prejudicial Is the Contrary Doctrine to All? Printed for the author, and are to be sold by W. Larnar ..., 1652.