APA (7th ed.) Citation

Rogers, W. (1681). The sixth part of The Christian-Quaker distinguished from the apostate & innovator: Being a just defence against the reproach of scandalous tongues and pens : and a proper looking-glass for a meeting in London, termed the second-days meeting, who are reputed the approvers of three books, or papers against a treatise entituled, The Christian-quaker, &c. in five parts given forth by W.R. on behalf of himself and other friends in truth concerned. Printed for W.R. ....

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Rogers, William. The Sixth Part of The Christian-Quaker Distinguished from the Apostate & Innovator: Being a Just Defence Against the Reproach of Scandalous Tongues and Pens : And a Proper Looking-glass for a Meeting in London, Termed the Second-days Meeting, Who Are Reputed the Approvers of Three Books, or Papers Against a Treatise Entituled, The Christian-quaker, &c. in Five Parts Given Forth by W.R. on Behalf of Himself and Other Friends in Truth Concerned. London: Printed for W.R. ..., 1681.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Rogers, William. The Sixth Part of The Christian-Quaker Distinguished from the Apostate & Innovator: Being a Just Defence Against the Reproach of Scandalous Tongues and Pens : And a Proper Looking-glass for a Meeting in London, Termed the Second-days Meeting, Who Are Reputed the Approvers of Three Books, or Papers Against a Treatise Entituled, The Christian-quaker, &c. in Five Parts Given Forth by W.R. on Behalf of Himself and Other Friends in Truth Concerned. Printed for W.R. ..., 1681.

Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.