APA (7th ed.) Citation

Gillespie, G. (1646). Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated: So as the present Erastian controversie concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiasticall government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlesnesse of the chief objections made against the Presbyteriall government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power. Printed by E.G. for Richard Whitaker ....

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Gillespie, George. Aarons Rod Blossoming, or, The Divine Ordinance of Church-government Vindicated: So as the Present Erastian Controversie Concerning the Distinction of Civill and Ecclesiasticall Government, Excommunication, and Suspension, Is Fully Debated and Discussed, from the Holy Scripture, from the Jewish and Christian Antiquities, from the Consent of Latter Writers, from the True Nature and Rights of Magistracy, and from the Groundlesnesse of the Chief Objections Made Against the Presbyteriall Government in Point of a Domineering Arbitrary Unlimited Power. London: Printed by E.G. for Richard Whitaker ..., 1646.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Gillespie, George. Aarons Rod Blossoming, or, The Divine Ordinance of Church-government Vindicated: So as the Present Erastian Controversie Concerning the Distinction of Civill and Ecclesiasticall Government, Excommunication, and Suspension, Is Fully Debated and Discussed, from the Holy Scripture, from the Jewish and Christian Antiquities, from the Consent of Latter Writers, from the True Nature and Rights of Magistracy, and from the Groundlesnesse of the Chief Objections Made Against the Presbyteriall Government in Point of a Domineering Arbitrary Unlimited Power. Printed by E.G. for Richard Whitaker ..., 1646.