APA (7th ed.) Citation

Hicks, T. (1674). The Quaker condemned out of his own mouth, or, An answer to Will. Pen's book entitled Reason against railing, and truth against fiction: Wherein he hathe confessed that if those things objected against the Quakers in two former dialogues be true, that then a Quaker is quite another thing than a Christian, that those matters heretofore objected were and are real truths and no fictions, is fully cleared and evinced in this third dialogue between a Christian and a Quaker. Printed for R.W. for Peter Parker, and are to be sold at his shop ....

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Hicks, Thomas. The Quaker Condemned Out of His Own Mouth, or, An Answer to Will. Pen's Book Entitled Reason Against Railing, and Truth Against Fiction: Wherein He Hathe Confessed That If Those Things Objected Against the Quakers in Two Former Dialogues Be True, That Then a Quaker Is Quite Another Thing than a Christian, That Those Matters Heretofore Objected Were and Are Real Truths and No Fictions, Is Fully Cleared and Evinced in This Third Dialogue Between a Christian and a Quaker. London: Printed for R.W. for Peter Parker, and are to be sold at his shop ..., 1674.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Hicks, Thomas. The Quaker Condemned Out of His Own Mouth, or, An Answer to Will. Pen's Book Entitled Reason Against Railing, and Truth Against Fiction: Wherein He Hathe Confessed That If Those Things Objected Against the Quakers in Two Former Dialogues Be True, That Then a Quaker Is Quite Another Thing than a Christian, That Those Matters Heretofore Objected Were and Are Real Truths and No Fictions, Is Fully Cleared and Evinced in This Third Dialogue Between a Christian and a Quaker. Printed for R.W. for Peter Parker, and are to be sold at his shop ..., 1674.