APA (7th ed.) Citation

Fuller, N. (1607). The argument of Master Nicholas Fuller, in the case of Thomas Lad, and Richard Maunsell, his clients: Wherein it is plainely proved, that the Ecclesiasticall Commissioners haue no power, by vertue of their commission, to imprison, to put to the Oath ex officio, or to fine any of his Maiesties subiects. Imprinted [at William Jones' secret press].

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Fuller, Nicholas. The Argument of Master Nicholas Fuller, in the Case of Thomas Lad, and Richard Maunsell, His Clients: Wherein It Is Plainely Proved, That the Ecclesiasticall Commissioners Haue No Power, by Vertue of Their Commission, to Imprison, to Put to the Oath Ex Officio, or to Fine Any of His Maiesties Subiects. [S.l.]: Imprinted [at William Jones' secret press], 1607.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Fuller, Nicholas. The Argument of Master Nicholas Fuller, in the Case of Thomas Lad, and Richard Maunsell, His Clients: Wherein It Is Plainely Proved, That the Ecclesiasticall Commissioners Haue No Power, by Vertue of Their Commission, to Imprison, to Put to the Oath Ex Officio, or to Fine Any of His Maiesties Subiects. Imprinted [at William Jones' secret press], 1607.