http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-2.xsd
This manuscript presents the first in-depth comparative study of peace referendums, demonstrating that the way peace negotiations are conducted has an impact on referendum outcomes. Specifically, Amaral compares the Annan Plan negotiations in Cyprus and the Good Friday Agreement (GFA) negotiations in Northern Ireland. The underlying aim is to uncover how peace negotiations can favor broad support for peace settlements and potentially avoid a failed referendum.
Peace negotiations and peace agreement referendums -- How peace negotiations shape agreement referendums -- The case studies -- The Annan Plan experience in Cyprus -- The Good Friday Agreement experience in Northern Ireland -- Comparing the Cypriot and Northern Irish experiences -- A new paradigm in peace negotiations.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 145-167) and index.
Syracuse studies on peace and conflict resolution