Debunking arguments in ethics /
In this crisply written book, Hanno Sauer offers the first book-length treatment of debunking arguments in ethics, developing an empirically informed and philosophically sophisticated account of genealogical arguments and their significance for the reliability of moral cognition. He breaks new groun...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge ; New York :
Cambridge University Press,
[2018]
|
| Subjects: |
| Summary: | In this crisply written book, Hanno Sauer offers the first book-length treatment of debunking arguments in ethics, developing an empirically informed and philosophically sophisticated account of genealogical arguments and their significance for the reliability of moral cognition. He breaks new ground by introducing a series of novel distinctions into the current debate, which allows him to develop a framework for assessing the prospects of debunking or vindicating our moral intuitions. He also challenges the justification of some of our moral judgments by showing that they are based on epistemically defective processes. His book is an original, cutting-edge contribution to the burgeoning field of empirically informed metaethics and will interest philosophers, psychologists and anyone interested in how, and whether, moral judgment works. |
|---|---|
| Physical Description: | xi, 243 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm. |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 222-238) and index. |
| ISBN: | 9781108423694 1108423698 |