Engineering ethics /

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: EBSCOhost
Other Authors: Davis, Michael, 1943-
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Aldershot, England ; Burlington, VT : Ashgate, [2005]
Series:International library of essays in public and professional ethics.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to the full text of this electronic book
Table of Contents:
  • Machine derived contents note: P RT I PRELIMINARIES
  • IMichael Davis (19)6), 'Defining "Engineer": How to Do it and Why It Matters',
  • joura! ofii fEngin ering Education, April, pp. 97-10LU I , 3
  • 2 lNoulnan f. Bowie (1985),J 'Aie Business Ethics and Engineering Ethics MLemberS
  • of the Saime Fanily?', Jo urnal of i Business Ethics, 4, pp. 43-52. 9
  • 3 Vivian Weil (i1994, 'Is Engineering Ethics Just Business Ethics?: Wihat Can
  • Emnpiical Findingis Tell Us?', International Journal of Applied PhilSosopy, 8,
  • pp. 9-13. 1.9
  • 4 Arthur Schwvartz (2004). 'Ethics in Conpetitive Bidding and Contracting',
  • Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, pp. 277-82. 25
  • PART I IMPORTANT CASES
  • SHenry Petroski (1995), 'The Iron Ring', American Scientist, 83, pp. 229-32. 33
  • 6 G.1, Friedlaxder (1974), 'The Case of the Three Engineers vs. BART', IEEE
  • Spetrum, 11, pp. 69-76 37
  • I Kermit Vandivier (1972), 'The Aircraft Brake Scandal', Harpers, 244, pp. 45-521 45
  • 8 John H. Fielder (1988), 'Give Goodrich a Break', Business and Professional
  • Ethic s Journal, 7, pp. 3-24. 53
  • 9 iJamecs 1, Taylor (1981), 'Moral Dilemmas in Highway Safety Decisions ' Trffic
  • Quarterly, 35, pp. 85-95. '. 175
  • 10 IGeorge RE. Meese (1982), 'The Sealed Beam Case: Engineering in the Public
  • and Private Interest', Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 1, pp, 1-20. 87
  • 11 Peter French (1982), 'What is Hamlet to McDonnell-Douglas or McDonnell-
  • Douglas to Hamlet: DC- O?', Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 1,
  • pp 1S-13. a 107
  • 12 Wade Robison, Roger Boisjoly. David Hlocker and Stefan Young (2002),
  • 4 Representation and Misrepresentation: Tufte an d the Morton Thiokol Engineers
  • on th Challenger' , Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, pp. 59-8 1. 121
  • " 3 avid Lorg Pamas (1987), 'SDI: A Violation of Professional Responsibility',
  • A,pp. 46
  • 52. 145
  • 14 John Ladd (1991), 'Bhopal: An Essay on Moral Responsibility and Civic Virtue'
  • Journal of Social Philosophy, 22, pp. 73-91. 153
  • 15 John Fielder (1.992), 'The Bioengineers Obligation to Patients', Journal of
  • Investigan tive Surgery, 5, pp. 201-8. 173
  • 16 Joe Morgenstern (195), 'The Fifty-Nine-Story Crisis', The New Yorker, 29 May,
  • pp. 45-53, 1 81
  • PARr Il PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
  • 17 Morris Llewellyn Cooke (1922), 'Ethics and the Engineering Profession', Annals
  • of the Association f/ Political and Social Science. 101 pp. 68-72 193
  • 18 John Ladd (1982), 'Collective and Individual Moral Responsibility in Engineering:
  • Some Questions'. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 1, pp. 3-10 199
  • SRobe J. Baurnm (1985), ' Access o Engineering Services: Rights and
  • Responsibilities of Professionals and the Public', Business and Proefssional
  • Ethics our nal 4, pp. 11 7-35. 207
  • 20 Michael C, McFarland (1986), 'The Public Health, Safety. and Welfare: An
  • Analysis of the Social Responsibility of Engineers . IEEE Technology and
  • S;ocu it.uvW geUe:, 5, pp. 18-26. 27
  • 21 Kenneth Kipnis (198 1), 'Engineers Who Kill: Professional Ethics ard the
  • Paramountcy of Public Safety ', Business and Professioal Ethics Journal, 1,
  • pp. 77-91. 2)37
  • 22 Roland Schinzinger and Mike NV. Marlin (1983), 'Infoimed Consent in
  • Engineering and Medicine', Business and Prif ssional ELhi is so nal, 3.
  • pp 67- 77. 253
  • 23 Deborah G. Johnson ( 1989), 'The Social ,Professional Responsibility of
  • Engineers', Ainnals o the New York Acaderiy ovf Scient/es. 577, pp. 106-14 265
  • 24 Louis L Bucciarelli (1985), 'Is Idiot Proof Safe Enough'. Applied1 Philosophyh 2,
  • pp. 49-57. 275
  • 25 Taft I Broonme,r (1989), 'Can Engineers Hold Public Interests Paramiountr?',
  • Research in Philosophvy and Technology, 9, pp. 3-11. 285
  • 126 Michael Davis (1991), 'Thinking Like an Engineer: The Place of a Code of Ethics
  • in the Practice of a Profession', Philosophiy and Public Affairs, 20, pp. 150-67. 295
  • 27 Charles E. Harris, Jr (995), 'Explaining Disasters: The Case for Preventive
  • Ethics', IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 14, pp. 22-27. 313
  • PART IV PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMJY IN LARGE ORGANIZATIONS
  • 28 Samuel C. Florman (1978), 'Moral Blueprints', Harper's, 257, pp. 30-32. 321
  • 2) Richard T. DeGeorge (1981), 'Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers in Large
  • Organizations: The Pinto Case', Business and Professional Ethics JournaiL 1, 3
  • pp. 1- 14. 325
  • 30 Albert Flores and Deborah G. Johnson (1983). 'Collective Responsibility and
  • Professional Roles', Ethics, 93, pp. 537-45. 339
  • 31 Kenneth 1). Alpern (1983), 'Moral Responsibility for Engineers', Business and
  • 1o,fessional Ethics Journal, 2, pp. 39-48. 349
  • 32 John I. Fielder (1992), 'Organizational Loyalty', Business and Professional
  • Ethics Journal, 1, pp. 71-90. 359
  • 33 Michael Davis (1996), 'Somne Paradoxes of Whistleblowing', Business and
  • Professional Ethics Journal, 15, pp. 3-19. 379
  • 34 Roger M. Boisjoly (1993), 'Personal Integrity and Accountability', Accounting
  • .i wns, 7, สน fr 5pp -69. 397
  • 35 Peter F. Meiksins and James M. Watson (1989), 'Professional Autonomy and
  • pp. 561-85. 409 .
  • 36 Michael Davis (1996), 'Professional Autonomy: A Framework for Empirical
  • Research', Business Et'hics Quarterly, 6, pp. 441-60. 435
  • 37 Eugene Schlossberger (1995), 'Technology and Civil Disobedience: Why
  • Engineers Have a Special Duty to Obey the Law',Science and Engineering
  • Ethics, 1, pp. 143-6& 455
  • PART V CODFS OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION
  • 38 L.L. Fuller (1955), 'The Philosophy of Codes of Ethics, Electrical Engineering,
  • "74,'pp'9118. 463
  • 39 EP. Aar Vesilind (1995), 'Evolution of the American Society of Civil Engineers
  • Code of Ethics', Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and
  • Pracice, 121, ppe 4-1R 4j67
  • 40 Heinz C. Luegenbiehl (1983), 'Codes of Ethics and the Moral Education of
  • Engineers', Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 2, pp. 41-61. 475
  • 41 Michael Dais (2001, 'T hc Myths about Codes of Engineering Ethics. IEEE
  • Technology and Society Magazine, 20, pp. 8-14 / 22. 497
  • 42.Larty May (1982), 'Professional Action and the Liabilities of Professional
  • .ssociations: A.S.M.E. v. Hydrolevel Corp'. Business and Profrssional Ethics
  • )urnal, 2 pp 1-14s. 51)5
  • 43 Stephen H. Unger (1986), 'Role of Engineering Societes in Controlling
  • Hazardous Technology', Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 112,
  • ee rd57 e 1519
  • PAR RESEARCH AND )EACHING
  • 44 RachIele D, Hollander and Nicholas ILL Steneck (1990), 'Science- and
  • g ne rgRelated Ethics and Value Studies: Characteristics of an Emerging
  • .edof Researc',Sience, Technology, ndH man V lues, 15, pp; 84-104. 52
  • 45 Joseph R. Hlerkert (2001), Futur e Directions in Engineering Ethics Research:
  • Mnicroelthi, iaroet-hics and lie Role of Professionai Societies', Science and
  • Engineering Ethics. 7, pp. 403-14. 551
  • 46 Michael Davis (2001). 'The Profesionl Approah to Engineering Ethics: Five
  • Recarh (Suestions, Sciene and nEeginpering Ethics', 7, p. 379-90. 563
  • 47 Vivian Mv. Weid (1977). i'Moral Issues in Engineering Ai Enginieering School
  • Instructional Approachi' Prfessional Enginee r, October, pp. 35-37. 575
  • 48 Ca&mine Whitbeck (199)6), 'Ethics as Design: Doing Justice to Ethical Proble s'.
  • in Caruline Whitbeck (ed.), Eitics in Engineerling lr atice and ReseicT' ,
  • Cambridge: C' rnbfidge University P'ess, pp. 53-73. 579
  • 49 Wilianm 1. Lynch and onald Kline (2000), 'Engineering Practice and Engineering
  • Ethics', Science', Technologyv, and 'Human Vailues, 25, pp. 195-225. 601
  • 50 ITZandvoort, 1. van de Poel and M. Brumsen (2000), 'Ethics in the Engineering
  • Curricula: Topics, Trenris and Chlallenges for the Future', European Journal of
  • Engineering Educatitmn, 25 pp. 291-302. 6 33
  • PART VII REPRISE APPIICATION TO THE CONCRETE
  • 51 Michael S.
  • Pritchard (1999) '"The Concrrete Sumo": Exigent Decision-MMakin
  • in Engineering', Science cnd Engineering Ethics, 5, p. 54L 647
  • 52 Taft t. Broome, Jr (1999), 'The Concrete Surno', Sience and ngineering
  • Eitics, 5, pp. 542-47, 547a. 649
  • 53 V'ivian Weil 1i999), "'Ulnders tandin 'iThe Concrete Surm?no"', Sien e andi
  • Engineerig Ethics, 5, pp 548-49, 657
  • 54 Micael S. Pritchrd (1999), Broome's "Concrete unmo"', Sc nce and
  • , Enginee ing Elhics, , lpp. 55A 53. 6 59
  • 55 Joseph R. Herkert (1999), 'Concrete Ethics'. cience and Enginerng Ethc 5,
  • pp. 554
  • 55, 555a. 63
  • 55 Michael Davis (1999), 'Wrestling with Broome's Concrete Sumo, Scincw e nd
  • ineerin Ethics, . 5pp 556-64. 667
  • 57 a t:T Broome, Jr (1999), 'Reply to Commentaries', Science and Engineering
  • Ethics, 5,. pp. 65 7. 77.