Forms of empire : the poetics of Victorian sovereignty /

What is the difference between peace and war? In this far-reaching and provocative study, Nathan K. Hensley shows how the modern state's anguished relationship to violence pushed literary writers to expand the capacities of literary form. The Victorian Era is often imagined as an 'age of e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hensley, Nathan K. (Author)
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Oxford, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, United States of America : Oxford University Press, 2016.
Edition:First edition.
Subjects:

MARC

Tag First Indicator Second Indicator Subfields
LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ii 4500
001 in00003965530
005 20180430075548.0
007 cr bn||||a|a||
007 ta
008 160519t20162016enka b 001 0 eng d
010 |a  2016942052 
019 |a 952154194  |a 966557360  |a 988827816  |a 999369581 
020 |a 9780198792451 
020 |a 019879245X 
020 |a 9780191834448 
020 |a 0191834440 
035 |a (OCoLC)ocn955312872 
035 |a (OCoLC)955312872  |z (OCoLC)952154194  |z (OCoLC)966557360  |z (OCoLC)988827816  |z (OCoLC)999369581 
040 |a ERASA  |b eng  |e rda  |c DLC  |d ERASA  |d YDXCP  |d BTCTA  |d BDX  |d NLE  |d OCLCF  |d WTU  |d HTM  |d CSAIL  |d MUU  |d IUL  |d NJR  |d OCLCO  |d CUY  |d UWW  |d CHVBK  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d UtOrBLW 
042 |a lccopycat 
043 |a e-uk-en 
049 |a TXAM 
050 0 0 |a PR461  |b .H467 2016 
050 1 4 |a PR468.I49  |b H46 2016 
082 0 4 |a 810/820 
100 1 |a Hensley, Nathan K.,  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2017031997 
245 1 0 |a Forms of empire :  |b the poetics of Victorian sovereignty /  |c Nathan K. Hensley. 
250 |a First edition. 
264 1 |a Oxford, United Kingdom ;  |a New York, NY, United States of America :  |b Oxford University Press,  |c 2016. 
264 4 |c ©2016 
300 |a x, 312 pages :  |b illustrations ;  |c 23 cm 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 275-296) and index. 
505 0 0 |t Introduction: Reading Endless War --  |g Part. I.  |t Equipoise:  |g 1.  |t Time and Violence in the Age of Equipoise ;  |g 2.  |t Reform Fiction's Logic of Belonging --  |g Part II.  |t And Elsewhere:  |g 3.  |t Form and Excess, Morant Bay and Swinburne ;  |g 4.  |t The Philosophy of Romance Form --  |t Conclusion: Endless War Then and Now. 
520 8 |a What is the difference between peace and war? In this far-reaching and provocative study, Nathan K. Hensley shows how the modern state's anguished relationship to violence pushed literary writers to expand the capacities of literary form. The Victorian Era is often imagined as an 'age of equipoise, ' but the period between 1837 and 1901 included more than two hundred separate armed conflicts: the first liberal state in history brought the world to order with hands stained in blood. Hensley unpacks the seeming paradoxes of the Pax Britannica's endless war by showing that the equipoise of the Victorian state depended on physical force to guarantee it. While inherent to all law, sovereign violence shuddered most visibly into being at the edges of law's reach, in the Empire, where emergency was the rule and death perversely routinized. Hensley tracks some of the era's most astute literary thinkers-George Eliot, Charles Dickens, Wilkie Collins, A.C. Swinburne, H. Rider Haggard, and Robert Louis Stevenson among them-as they generated techniques of representation that might account for fact that an empire built on freedom had the threat of death coiled at its very heart.0Free indirect discourse, lyric tension, and the category of novelistic action itself: these and other seemingly 'aesthetic' matters, Hensley shows, in fact mediate a problem that was finally political, yet unthinkable from within the assumptions of orthodox Victorian theory. In contrast to the progressive idealism that remains our common sense, the writers at the core of Forms of Empire moved beyond embarrassment and denial in the face of modernity's uncanny relation to killing. Drawing on robust archival work, careful literary analyses, and a theoretical framework that troubles the distinction between 'historicist' and 'formalist' approaches, Forms of Empire links the Victorian period to the present and articulates a forceful vision of why literary thinking matters now.--  |c Source other than Library of Congress. 
650 0 |a English literature  |y 19th century  |x History and criticism.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008102754 
650 0 |a Sovereignty in literature.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh94009085 
650 7 |a English literature.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00911989 
650 7 |a Sovereignty in literature.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01127385 
650 7 |a Englisch.  |2 gnd  |0 (DE-588)4014777-0 
650 7 |a Gewalt  |g Motiv.  |0 (DE-588)4113748-6  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Krieg.  |g Motiv.  |0 (DE-588)4136410-7  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Literatur.  |2 gnd  |0 (DE-588)4035964-5 
648 7 |a 1800-1899  |2 fast 
655 7 |a Criticism, interpretation, etc.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01411635 
948 |a cataloged  |b h  |c 2018/2/1  |d c  |e ceaton  |f 2:16:53 pm 
994 |a C0  |b TXA 
999 f f |s 8cd4be15-a1f3-3fc4-b470-96870a925581  |i 8c4f9be3-cb15-3625-bd0a-d0fa7d564918  |t 0 
952 f f |p normal  |a Texas A&M University  |b College Station  |c Sterling C. Evans Library  |s Evans stk  |d Evans: Library Stacks  |t 0  |e PR461 .H467 2016  |h Library of Congress classification  |i unmediated -- volume  |m A14850447369 
998 f f |a PR461 .H467 2016  |t 0  |l Evans: Library Stacks