United States. Interstate Commerce Commission. (1914). In matter of applications nos. 205, 342, 343, 344, 349, 350 and 352, on behalf of carriers parties to tariffs therein named, by R. H. Countiss, C. W. Bullen, and J. F. Tucker, their agents, for relief from provisions of 4th section of Act to Regulate Commerce, as amended June 18, 1910, with respect to commodity rates from eastern points of shipment which are higher to intermediate points than to Pacific coast terminals. GPO.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationUnited States. Interstate Commerce Commission. In Matter of Applications Nos. 205, 342, 343, 344, 349, 350 and 352, on Behalf of Carriers Parties to Tariffs Therein Named, by R. H. Countiss, C. W. Bullen, and J. F. Tucker, Their Agents, for Relief from Provisions of 4th Section of Act to Regulate Commerce, as Amended June 18, 1910, with Respect to Commodity Rates from Eastern Points of Shipment Which Are Higher to Intermediate Points than to Pacific Coast Terminals. [Washington]: GPO, 1914.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationUnited States. Interstate Commerce Commission. In Matter of Applications Nos. 205, 342, 343, 344, 349, 350 and 352, on Behalf of Carriers Parties to Tariffs Therein Named, by R. H. Countiss, C. W. Bullen, and J. F. Tucker, Their Agents, for Relief from Provisions of 4th Section of Act to Regulate Commerce, as Amended June 18, 1910, with Respect to Commodity Rates from Eastern Points of Shipment Which Are Higher to Intermediate Points than to Pacific Coast Terminals. GPO, 1914.