Anatomy of malice : the enigma of the Nazi war criminals /
When the ashes had settled after World War II and the Allies convened an international war crimes trial in Nuremberg, a psychiatrist, Douglas Kelley, and a psychologist, Gustave Gilbert, tried to fathom the psychology of the Nazi leaders, using extensive psychiatric interviews, IQ tests, and Rorscha...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New Haven ; London :
Yale University Press,
[2016]
|
| Subjects: |
Table of Contents:
- Part One: Run-Up To Nuremberg
- The Holocaust: How Was This Genocide Different from All the Rest?
- The Gathering at Ashcan
- Part Two: Nuremberg
- The War Crimes Trial: What Do We Do with the Criminals?
- War Criminals with Psychiatrists and Psychologists?
- Part Three: Faces Of Malice
- Defendant Robert Ley: "Bad Brain"
- Defendant Hermann Goring: "Amiable Psychopath"
- Defendant Julius Streicher: "Bad Man"
- Defendant Rudolf Hess: "So Plainly Mad"
- Part Four: Coda To Nuremberg: Rorschachs and Recriminations
- Douglas Kelley and Gustave Gilbert: A Collaboration from Hell
- A Message in the Rorschachs?
- Malice on a Continuum: The Social Psychologists' Perspective
- Malice as Categorically Different: Encounters with "the Other"