United States. Federal Trade Commission. (1929). In U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for 3rd Circuit, Mar. term, 1929; Chipman Knitting Mills and Chas. Chipman's Sons Company, Incorporated, petitioners volume Federal Trade Commission, respondent: Answer in nature of cross bill. U.S. GPO.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationUnited States. Federal Trade Commission. In U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for 3rd Circuit, Mar. Term, 1929; Chipman Knitting Mills and Chas. Chipman's Sons Company, Incorporated, Petitioners Volume Federal Trade Commission, Respondent: Answer in Nature of Cross Bill. Washington: U.S. GPO, 1929.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationUnited States. Federal Trade Commission. In U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for 3rd Circuit, Mar. Term, 1929; Chipman Knitting Mills and Chas. Chipman's Sons Company, Incorporated, Petitioners Volume Federal Trade Commission, Respondent: Answer in Nature of Cross Bill. U.S. GPO, 1929.