Ethics in science : ethical misconduct in scientific research /
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Corporate Author: | |
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Boca Raton, FL :
Taylor & Francis,
[2012]
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to the full text of this electronic book |
Table of Contents:
- Introduction
- About the author
- Chapter 1. Irresponsible conduct in research: What is it, why does it happen, and how do we identify it when it happens?
- What constitutes scientific misconduct?
- Intentional negligence in acknowledgment of previous work
- What is it?
- Why does it happen?
- How is it caught?
- Deliberate fabrication of data you have collected
- What is it?
- Why does it happen?
- How is it caught?
- Deliberate omission of known data that does not agree with hypotheses
- What is it?
- Why does it happen?
- How is it caught?
- Passing another researcher's data as one's own
- What is it?
- Why does it happen?
- How is it caught?
- Publication of results without consent of all the researchers
- What is it?
- Why does it happen?
- How is it caught?
- Failure to acknowledge all the researchers who performed the work
- What is it?
- Why does it happen?
- How is it caught?
- Authorship and intellectual property
- Conflict of interest issues
- What is it?
- Why does it happen?
- How is it caught?
- Repeated publication of too-similar results
- What is it?
- Why does it happen?
- How is it caught?
- Breach of confidentiality
- What is it?
- Why does it happen?
- How is it caught?
- Misrepresenting others' previous work
- What is it?
- Why does it happen?
- How is it caught?
- Bad ethics vs. bad science
- Scenario 1
- Scenario 2
- New results that prove old results wrong
- The whistle-blower's dilemma
- Wrapping up
- Chapter 2. What happens to those who violate responsible conduct?
- Human and animal subjects
- Wrapping up
- Chapter 3. What is peer review's role in responsible conduct in research?
- Revisiting Vlad and Frankie
- Can peer reviewers be unethical?
- Wrapping up
- Chapter 4. What effect on the public does scientific misconduct have?
- MMR and autism
- Climategate
- HIV vaccine
- Animal rights groups
- Cold fusion
- Bernard Kettlewell
- Electromagnetic field and high-tension power lines
- Fracking and pollution
- Wrapping up
- Chapter 5. What constitutes responsible conduct from the point of view of human/animal subjects in research?
- Wrapping up
- Chapter 6. Can intervention or interference by the federal government result in research misconduct?
- Wrapping up
- Chapter 7. Can we prevent misconduct in research?
- Intentional negligence in acknowledgment of previous work
- Deliberate fabrication of data
- Deliberate omission of known data that doesn't agree with hypotheses
- Passing another researcher's data as one's own
- Publication of results without consent of all the researchers
- Failure to acknowledge all the researchers who performed the work
- Conflict-of-interest issues
- Repeated publication of too-similar results
- Breach of confidentiality
- Misrepresenting others' work
- Wrapping up
- Chapter 8. Case Studies
- Darwin and Wallace
- Summary
- What happened?
- Resolution
- Questions to ponder
- Sources
- Rangaswamy Srinivasan-VISX patent dispute
- Summary
- The story
- Questions to ponder
- Sources
- Schwartz and Mirkin
- Summary
- How did it start?
- Mirkin says
- Schwartz says
- Mirkin responds
- Villa-Komaroff's role
- Resolution
- Questions to ponder
- Sources
- Corey and Woodward
- Summary
- Corey says
- Hoffmann says
- L.J. Oosterhoff
- Resolution
- Questions to ponder
- Sources
- Córdova, Scripps Research Institute, and Stockholm University
- Summary
- What happened?
- Resolution
- Questions to ponder
- Sources
- La Clair and hexacyclinol
- Summary
- What happened?
- Resolution
- Questions to ponder
- Sources
- Woodward and quinine
- Summary
- What happened?
- Resolution
- Questions to ponder
- Sources
- DNA
- Summary
- What happened?
- Resolution
- Questions to ponder
- Sources
- David Baltimore and Teresa Imanishi-Kari
- Summary
- O'Toole's side
- Charles Maplethorpe
- Teresa Imanishi-Kari
- David Baltimore
- The public perception
- Conclusions
- Questions to ponder
- Sources
- John Fenn-Yale patent dispute
- Summary
- The story
- Questions to ponder
- Sources
- VIOXX®
- Summary
- Question to ponder
- Sources
- Index.