Ethics in science : ethical misconduct in scientific research /

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D'Angelo, John
Corporate Author: ProQuest (Firm)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Boca Raton, FL : Taylor & Francis, [2012]
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to the full text of this electronic book
Table of Contents:
  • Introduction
  • About the author
  • Chapter 1. Irresponsible conduct in research: What is it, why does it happen, and how do we identify it when it happens?
  • What constitutes scientific misconduct?
  • Intentional negligence in acknowledgment of previous work
  • What is it?
  • Why does it happen?
  • How is it caught?
  • Deliberate fabrication of data you have collected
  • What is it?
  • Why does it happen?
  • How is it caught?
  • Deliberate omission of known data that does not agree with hypotheses
  • What is it?
  • Why does it happen?
  • How is it caught?
  • Passing another researcher's data as one's own
  • What is it?
  • Why does it happen?
  • How is it caught?
  • Publication of results without consent of all the researchers
  • What is it?
  • Why does it happen?
  • How is it caught?
  • Failure to acknowledge all the researchers who performed the work
  • What is it?
  • Why does it happen?
  • How is it caught?
  • Authorship and intellectual property
  • Conflict of interest issues
  • What is it?
  • Why does it happen?
  • How is it caught?
  • Repeated publication of too-similar results
  • What is it?
  • Why does it happen?
  • How is it caught?
  • Breach of confidentiality
  • What is it?
  • Why does it happen?
  • How is it caught?
  • Misrepresenting others' previous work
  • What is it?
  • Why does it happen?
  • How is it caught?
  • Bad ethics vs. bad science
  • Scenario 1
  • Scenario 2
  • New results that prove old results wrong
  • The whistle-blower's dilemma
  • Wrapping up
  • Chapter 2. What happens to those who violate responsible conduct?
  • Human and animal subjects
  • Wrapping up
  • Chapter 3. What is peer review's role in responsible conduct in research?
  • Revisiting Vlad and Frankie
  • Can peer reviewers be unethical?
  • Wrapping up
  • Chapter 4. What effect on the public does scientific misconduct have?
  • MMR and autism
  • Climategate
  • HIV vaccine
  • Animal rights groups
  • Cold fusion
  • Bernard Kettlewell
  • Electromagnetic field and high-tension power lines
  • Fracking and pollution
  • Wrapping up
  • Chapter 5. What constitutes responsible conduct from the point of view of human/animal subjects in research?
  • Wrapping up
  • Chapter 6. Can intervention or interference by the federal government result in research misconduct?
  • Wrapping up
  • Chapter 7. Can we prevent misconduct in research?
  • Intentional negligence in acknowledgment of previous work
  • Deliberate fabrication of data
  • Deliberate omission of known data that doesn't agree with hypotheses
  • Passing another researcher's data as one's own
  • Publication of results without consent of all the researchers
  • Failure to acknowledge all the researchers who performed the work
  • Conflict-of-interest issues
  • Repeated publication of too-similar results
  • Breach of confidentiality
  • Misrepresenting others' work
  • Wrapping up
  • Chapter 8. Case Studies
  • Darwin and Wallace
  • Summary
  • What happened?
  • Resolution
  • Questions to ponder
  • Sources
  • Rangaswamy Srinivasan-VISX patent dispute
  • Summary
  • The story
  • Questions to ponder
  • Sources
  • Schwartz and Mirkin
  • Summary
  • How did it start?
  • Mirkin says
  • Schwartz says
  • Mirkin responds
  • Villa-Komaroff's role
  • Resolution
  • Questions to ponder
  • Sources
  • Corey and Woodward
  • Summary
  • Corey says
  • Hoffmann says
  • L.J. Oosterhoff
  • Resolution
  • Questions to ponder
  • Sources
  • Córdova, Scripps Research Institute, and Stockholm University
  • Summary
  • What happened?
  • Resolution
  • Questions to ponder
  • Sources
  • La Clair and hexacyclinol
  • Summary
  • What happened?
  • Resolution
  • Questions to ponder
  • Sources
  • Woodward and quinine
  • Summary
  • What happened?
  • Resolution
  • Questions to ponder
  • Sources
  • DNA
  • Summary
  • What happened?
  • Resolution
  • Questions to ponder
  • Sources
  • David Baltimore and Teresa Imanishi-Kari
  • Summary
  • O'Toole's side
  • Charles Maplethorpe
  • Teresa Imanishi-Kari
  • David Baltimore
  • The public perception
  • Conclusions
  • Questions to ponder
  • Sources
  • John Fenn-Yale patent dispute
  • Summary
  • The story
  • Questions to ponder
  • Sources
  • VIOXX®
  • Summary
  • Question to ponder
  • Sources
  • Index.