http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-2.xsd
why gender stereotypes, do not harm women candidates
Tables; Acknowledgments; CHAPTER 1; Introduction; CHAPTER 2; Theoretical Foundations; CHAPTER 3; How to Study Gender Stereotype Usage and Double Standardsin Campaigns; CHAPTER 4; Descriptive Candidate Gender Stereotypes and the Roleof Candidate Experience; CHAPTER 5; Tears and Anger on the Campaign Trail; CHAPTER 6; Unbinding the Double Bind; CHAPTER 7; Knowledge Gaffes; CHAPTER 8; Reassessing the Parity Problem; CHAPTER 9; A Bright Future for Women in Politics; APPENDIX 1; Text of Newspaper Treatments; APPENDIX 2; Questionnaire; APPENDIX 3; How the Public Responds to Each Behavior.
APPENDIX 4How the Public Responds to Candidate Experience; APPENDIX 5; Results for Candidate Experience * Candidate Gender; APPENDIX 6; Results for Candidate Gender (Control Group only); APPENDIX 7; Results for Crying * Candidate Gender; APPENDIX 8; Results for Anger * Candidate Gender; APPENDIX 9; Results for Toughness * Candidate Gender; APPENDIX 10; Results for Lack of Empathy * Candidate Gender; APPENDIX 11; Results for Knowledge Gaffe * Candidate Gender; References; Index.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Princeton : Princeton University Press, [2013]