APA (7th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, U.S. Postal Service, and the Census. (2014). Is the federal government's General Schedule (GS) a viable personnel system for the future?: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, US Postal Service and the Census of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, second session, July 15, 2014. U.S. Government Printing Office.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, U.S. Postal Service, and the Census. Is the Federal Government's General Schedule (GS) a Viable Personnel System for the Future?: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, US Postal Service and the Census of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, Second Session, July 15, 2014. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2014.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, U.S. Postal Service, and the Census. Is the Federal Government's General Schedule (GS) a Viable Personnel System for the Future?: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, US Postal Service and the Census of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, Second Session, July 15, 2014. U.S. Government Printing Office, 2014.