Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved As Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than As Treaties.

Discusses why trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, have been treated as Congressional-executive agreements subject to a majority vote of both houses of Congress rat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, ProQuest (Firm)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 2001.
Series:U.S. Congressional Research.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to the full text of this electronic book

MARC

Tag First Indicator Second Indicator Subfields
LEADER 00000cam a22000001a 4500
001 in00003382521
006 m d f
007 cr bn mmmapmmp
008 100720s2001 dcu o f000 0 eng d
005 20260430192612.4
035 |a cis2007895892 
040 |a ProQuest  |c ProQuest  |d UtOrBLW 
043 |a n-us--- 
099 |a CRS-2001-AML-0065 
110 2 |a Library of Congress.  |b Congressional Research Service. 
245 1 0 |a Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved As Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than As Treaties. 
264 1 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b [publisher not identified],  |c 2001. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed July 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. 
500 |a CRS Report. 
520 |a Discusses why trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, have been treated as Congressional-executive agreements subject to a majority vote of both houses of Congress rather than as treaties requiring a two-thirds vote of the Senate. 
500 |a Electronic resource. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Congress  |v Rules and practice. 
650 0 |a Executive-legislative relations. 
650 0 |a Commercial treaties. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.  |2 local 
710 2 |a ProQuest (Firm) 
776 0 8 |i Microfiche version:   |a Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.  |t Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved As Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than As Treaties 
830 0 |a U.S. Congressional Research. 
856 4 0 |u http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login?url=https://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-2001-AML-0065  |z Connect to the full text of this electronic book  |t 0 
999 |a MARS 
999 f f |s 00c2c2ca-0abc-3fc9-ba02-9bff413949cf  |i 94df1e8c-1bb4-3a25-89b4-12532d38b917  |t 0 
952 f f |a Texas A&M University  |b College Station  |c Electronic Resources  |s www_evans  |d Available Online  |t 0  |e CRS-2001-AML-0065  |h Other scheme 
998 f f |a CRS-2001-AML-0065  |t 0  |l Available Online