State and Local Economic Sanctions : Some Constitutional Issues.

Summarizes constitutional arguments made for and against State and local economic sanctions against individuals and firms that do business with or in foreign countries whose conduct the jurisdictions find objectionable. Discusses 2000 Supreme Court decision in Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Counci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, ProQuest (Firm)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 2000.
Series:U.S. Congressional Research.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to the full text of this electronic book

MARC

Tag First Indicator Second Indicator Subfields
LEADER 00000cam a22000001a 4500
001 in00003379939
006 m d f
007 cr bn mmmapmmp
008 100720s2000 dcu o f000 0 eng d
005 20260430210120.5
035 |a cis2007894634 
040 |a ProQuest  |c ProQuest  |d UtOrBLW 
043 |a n-us--- 
099 |a CRS-2000-AML-0027 
110 2 |a Library of Congress.  |b Congressional Research Service. 
245 1 0 |a State and Local Economic Sanctions :  |b Some Constitutional Issues. 
264 1 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b [publisher not identified],  |c 2000. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed July 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. 
500 |a CRS Report. 
520 |a Summarizes constitutional arguments made for and against State and local economic sanctions against individuals and firms that do business with or in foreign countries whose conduct the jurisdictions find objectionable. Discusses 2000 Supreme Court decision in Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council, which held a Massachusetts law restricting State transactions with firms doing business with Burma was preempted by Federal Burma sanctions and that its application was unconstitutional under Supremacy Clause. 
500 |a Electronic resource. 
650 0 |a Constitutional law. 
650 0 |a Federal government. 
651 0 |a Massachusetts. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.  |2 local 
710 2 |a ProQuest (Firm) 
776 0 8 |i Microfiche version:   |a Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.  |t State and Local Economic Sanctions 
830 0 |a U.S. Congressional Research. 
856 4 0 |u http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login?url=https://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-2000-AML-0027  |z Connect to the full text of this electronic book  |t 0 
999 |a MARS 
999 f f |s d83a258f-b37e-3f37-82b0-0450995b9804  |i b6ee5e71-46e3-309f-a5c0-222c92b08c6e  |t 0 
952 f f |a Texas A&M University  |b College Station  |c Electronic Resources  |s www_evans  |d Available Online  |t 0  |e CRS-2000-AML-0027  |h Other scheme 
998 f f |a CRS-2000-AML-0027  |t 0  |l Available Online