Cover Image

Appearance of Impropriety as a Standard for Disciplining Federal Employees.

Discusses whether the standard of conduct requiring Federal employees to avoid actions giving an "appearance of impropriety" may be used as a basis for disciplinary measures, including removal from office.

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors:	Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, ProQuest (Firm)
Format:	eBook
Language:	English
Published:	[Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 1985.
Series:	U.S. Congressional Research.
Subjects:	Judge-made law. Conflict of interests. Sentences (Criminal procedure) Electronic books.
Online Access:	Connect to the full text of this electronic book

Similar Items

Federal Sentencing Guidelines Downward Departures After Koon.
Published: (1999)

Federal Habeas Corpus : A Brief Legal Overview.
Published: (2006)

Federal Habeas Corpus : An Abridged Stretch.
Published: (2006)

Federal Sentencing Guidelines : Background, Legal Analysis, and Policy Options.
Published: (2005)

Federal Sentencing Guidelines : Background, Legal Analysis, and Policy Options.
Published: (2007)

Federal Sentencing Guidelines : Background, Legal Analysis, and Policy Options.
Published: (2005)

Federal Sentencing Guidelines : Background, Legal Analysis, and Policy Options.
Published: (2007)

Federal Sentencing Guidelines : Background, Legal Analysis, and Policy Options.
Published: (2007)

Federal Sentencing Guidelines : Background, Legal Analysis, and Policy Options.
Published: (2007)

Child Obscenity and Pornography Prevention Act of 2002.
Published: (2002)

Sentencing Levels for Crack and Powder Cocaine : Kimbrough v. United States and the Impact of United States v. Booker.
Published: (2009)

Unborn Victims of Violence Act.
Published: (2004)

Criminal Procedure : Brief Summaries of Major Decisions of the "Warren Court" Relating to the Rights of Persons Accused of Crime.
Published: (1969)

Sentencing Levels for Crack and Powder Cocaine : Kimbrough v. United States and the Impact of United States v. Booker.
Published: (2007)

The appearance of impropriety as a standard for disciplining federal employees /
by: Maskell, Jack
Published: (1985)

United States Sentencing Guidelines and the Supreme Court : Booker, Fanfan, Blakely, Apprendi, and Mistretta.
Published: (2004)

Mandatory Sentencing and the Requirements of the Eighth Amendment After Harmelin v. Michigan.
Published: (1991)

U.S. Sentencing Commission : Preliminary Analysis.
Published: (1989)

Legal Issues of Insider Trading.
Published: (1987)

Sentencing Guidelines for Federal Courts : Policy Considerations.
Published: (1987)

Relating to instructions by judge to juries in Federal district courts.
Published: (1952)

Federal Sentencing Procedures. Report.
Published: (1958)

Restitution Amendments Act of 1985.
Published: (1985)

Constitutional Analysis of "Revolving Door" Proposal Regarding Expansion of Post-Employment Conflicts of Interest Law for Federal Officials.
Published: (1988)

Validity of Legislation Terminating Federal Court Jurisdiction To Review State Court Rulings on Confessions.
Published: (1968)

Criminal Fine Enforcement Act of 1984.
Published: (1984)

Teague New Rule Doctrine in Lower Federal Courts.
Published: (1992)

Improving the administration of justice by authorizing the judicial conference of the United States to establish institutes and joint councils on sentencing, to provide additional methods of sentencing.
Published: (1958)

Bail Reform Act of 1984.
Published: (1984)

Congress's Contempt Power : Law, History, Practice, and Procedure.
Published: (2008)

United States v. Santos : "Proceeds" in Federal Criminal Money Laundering Statute, 18 U.S.C. Section 1956, Means "Profits," Not "Gross Receipts".
Published: (2009)

United States v. Santos : "Proceeds" in Federal Criminal Money Laundering Statute, 18 U.S.C. Section 1956, Means "Profits," Not "Gross Receipts".
Published: (2009)

United States v. Santos : "Proceeds" in Federal Criminal Money Laundering Statute, 18 U.S.C. Section 1956, Means "Profits," Not "Gross Receipts".
Published: (2009)

United States v. Santos : "Proceeds" in Federal Criminal Money Laundering Statute, 18 U.S.C. Section 1956, Means "Profits," Not "Gross Receipts".
Published: (2009)

Gambling on Indian Reservations.
Published: (1985)

No Electronic Theft (NET) Act.
Published: (1997)

Indian Tribal Government Criminal Jurisdiction Over Indians Not Enrolled in the Tribe.
Published: (1991)

Federal sentencing : a sketch of Apprendi v. New Jersey and its impact /
by: Doyle, Charles
Published: (2019)

Right to Counsel in Criminal Proceedings : Federal and State Courts.
Published: (1975)

Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination May Not Be Extended in Cases Where Only a Foreign Prosecution Is Possible.
Published: (1998)