Multiple Group Credit Unions : Litigation and Potential Legislative Responses.

Discusses the rationale and implications of the ruling in First National Bank and Trust Company v. National Credit Union Administration, 90 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 1996), which limits the expansion of occupational and associational Federal credit unions consisting of more than one group having a common...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, ProQuest (Firm)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 1996.
Series:U.S. Congressional Research.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to the full text of this electronic book

MARC

Tag First Indicator Second Indicator Subfields
LEADER 00000cam a22000001a 4500
001 in00003370367
006 m d f
007 cr bn mmmapmmp
008 100715s1996 dcu o f000 0 eng d
005 20260429184552.4
035 |a cis2007889534 
040 |a ProQuest  |c ProQuest  |d UtOrBLW 
043 |a n-us--- 
099 |a CRS-1996-AML-0037 
110 2 |a Library of Congress.  |b Congressional Research Service. 
245 1 0 |a Multiple Group Credit Unions :  |b Litigation and Potential Legislative Responses. 
264 1 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b [publisher not identified],  |c 1996. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed July 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. 
500 |a CRS Report. 
520 |a Discusses the rationale and implications of the ruling in First National Bank and Trust Company v. National Credit Union Administration, 90 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 1996), which limits the expansion of occupational and associational Federal credit unions consisting of more than one group having a common bond. Reviews background and proceedings of this and other litigation and assesses potential legislative responses to this ruling. Also examines whether banking industry has standing to challenge National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) rulings and whether the NCUA exceeded its authority in permitting multiple group expansion. 
500 |a Electronic resource. 
650 0 |a Banks and banking. 
650 0 |a Credit unions. 
650 0 |a Actions and defenses. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.  |2 local 
710 2 |a ProQuest (Firm) 
776 0 8 |i Microfiche version:   |a Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.  |t Multiple Group Credit Unions: Litigation and Potential Legislative Responses 
830 0 |a U.S. Congressional Research. 
856 4 0 |u http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login?url=https://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-1996-AML-0037  |z Connect to the full text of this electronic book  |t 0 
999 |a MARS 
999 f f |s 692debd1-49e7-3951-a3d1-710751252924  |i 339dfa9a-ec9a-3f67-99fc-32541637f745  |t 0 
952 f f |a Texas A&M University  |b College Station  |c Electronic Resources  |s www_evans  |d Available Online  |t 0  |e CRS-1996-AML-0037  |h Other scheme 
998 f f |a CRS-1996-AML-0037  |t 0  |l Available Online