Cover Image

Line Item Veto Act Unconstitutional : Clinton v. City of New York.

Discusses Clinton v. City of New York, the Supreme Court case that declared the Line Item Veto Act unconstitutional on the grounds that it violated the Presentment Clause of the Constitution by unconstitutionally empowering the President to repeal or amend provisions of duly enacted bills.

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, ProQuest (Firm)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 1998.
Series:U.S. Congressional Research.
Subjects:
United States. > Congress > Powers and duties.
Executive power.
Electronic books.
Online Access:Connect to the full text of this electronic book
Description
Summary:Discusses Clinton v. City of New York, the Supreme Court case that declared the Line Item Veto Act unconstitutional on the grounds that it violated the Presentment Clause of the Constitution by unconstitutionally empowering the President to repeal or amend provisions of duly enacted bills.
Item Description:Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed July 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
CRS Report.
Electronic resource.
Physical Description:1 online resource.