Breaking and Entering To Install an Electronic Device : Dalia v. U.S.

Discusses the Supreme Court decision in Dalia v. U.S., which ruled that if law enforcement officers secure judicial authorization for electronic eavesdropping, they may enter the subject premises covertly or surreptitiously without specific judicial authorization for the entry.

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors:	Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, ProQuest (Firm)
Format:	eBook
Language:	English
Published:	[Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 1979-1980.
Series:	U.S. Congressional Research.
Subjects:	Judge-made law. Electronic surveillance. Electronic books.
Online Access:	Connect to the full text of this electronic book

Description
Summary:	Discusses the Supreme Court decision in Dalia v. U.S., which ruled that if law enforcement officers secure judicial authorization for electronic eavesdropping, they may enter the subject premises covertly or surreptitiously without specific judicial authorization for the entry.
Item Description:	Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed June 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. CRS Report. Electronic resource.
Physical Description:	1 online resource.