Congressional Immunity and Criminal Proceedings : U.S. v. Helstoski and Helstoski v. Meanor.
Reviews Supreme Court cases involving the congressional speech or debate immunity in the context of criminal proceedings, in which the Court ruled that the immunity prohibited the introduction of any evidence referring to a legislative act that had been performed.
| Corporate Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
[publisher not identified],
1979-1980.
|
| Series: | U.S. Congressional Research.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to the full text of this electronic book |
| Summary: | Reviews Supreme Court cases involving the congressional speech or debate immunity in the context of criminal proceedings, in which the Court ruled that the immunity prohibited the introduction of any evidence referring to a legislative act that had been performed. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed June 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. CRS Report. Electronic resource. |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource. |