Cover Image

Precedents for U.S. Abrogation of Treaties.

Examines termination of treaties effected by either both houses of Congress, the Senate, the President, or some combination of these three parties.

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors:	Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, ProQuest (Firm)
Format:	eBook
Language:	English
Published:	[Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 1974.
Series:	U.S. Congressional Research.
Subjects:	Executive-legislative relations. Treaties. Electronic books.
Online Access:	Connect to the full text of this electronic book

Similar Items

The abrogation of the Russian Treaty.
Published: (1911)

Petition against abrogation of treaty between United States and Hawaii.
Published: (1897)

Enforcement of the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement.
Published: (1989)

Abrogation of the Hawaiian Treaty : hearings before the United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Forty-Seventh Congress, first session, on Feb. 10, 17, 1882.
Published: (1882)

[Resolution to amend rules so that Senate shall consider and act upon treaties and Executive nominations in open session.].
Published: (1887)

[Resolution that treaties with foreign powers be considered in public and in open session unless communicated in confidence by President.].
Published: (1871)

Proposals to Amend the Treaty-making Provisions of the Constitution : Views of Deans and Professors of Law.
Published: (1953)

[Petition for abrogation of extradition treaty with Russia.].
Published: (1894)

Treaties and conventions concluded between the United States of America and other powers since July 4, 1776. Containing notes, with references to negotiations preceding the several treaties, to the executive, legislative, or judicial construction of them, and to the causes of the abrogation of some of them; a chronological list of treaties; and an analytical index.
Published: (1889)

Return of Certain Treaty Amendments.
Published: (1991)

Examples of Treaties Not Ratified Due to Senate Reservations And/or Amendments.
Published: (1987)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2009)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than As Treaties.
Published: (2006)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2006)

Treaties and conventions concluded between the United States of America and other powers since July 4, 1776. Containing notes, with references to negotiations preceding the several treaties, to the executive, legislative, or judicial construction of them, and to the causes of the abrogation of some of them; a chronological list of treaties; and an analytical index.
Published: (1889)

Providing That the President Shall Continue To Adhere to the Numerical Sublimits of the SALT Agreements As Long As the Soviet Union Does Likewise.
Published: (1986)

Conduct of National Security Policy. Selected Readings.
Published: (1965)

Trade Agreements, the Congress, and the Use of Fast-Track Procedures.
Published: (1991)

Trade Promotion Authority (Fast-Track Authority for Trade Agreements) : Background and Developments in the 107th Congress.
Published: (2003)

Fast-Track Procedures for Trade Agreements : Implications for Congress of Their Extension.
Published: (1991)

Trade Negotiating Authority : The 1991 Debate on Extension.
Published: (1992)

Chinese treaty. Concurrent resolutions of the Legislature of California, praying for the modification or abrogation of the Burlingame or Chinese Treaty.
Published: (1878)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2007)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2004)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2002)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2004)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2001)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2002)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2008)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2004)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2002)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2004)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2006)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved As Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than As Treaties.
Published: (2001)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved As Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than As Treaties.
Published: (2003)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2008)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2005)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2002)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved As Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than As Treaties.
Published: (1999)

Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties.
Published: (2007)