APA (7th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Property Rights, & ProQuest (Firm). (2005). Judicial activism vs. democracy: What are the national implications of the Massachusetts Goodridge decision and the judicial invalidation of traditional marriage laws? : hearing before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Property Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Eighth Congress, second session, March 3, 2004. U.S. G.P.O..

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Property Rights, and ProQuest (Firm). Judicial Activism Vs. Democracy: What Are the National Implications of the Massachusetts Goodridge Decision and the Judicial Invalidation of Traditional Marriage Laws? : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Property Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Second Session, March 3, 2004. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2005.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Property Rights, and ProQuest (Firm). Judicial Activism Vs. Democracy: What Are the National Implications of the Massachusetts Goodridge Decision and the Judicial Invalidation of Traditional Marriage Laws? : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Property Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Second Session, March 3, 2004. U.S. G.P.O., 2005.