Hudson v. Michigan : The Exclusionary Rule's Applicability to "Knock-and-Announce" Violations.
Discusses 2006 Supreme Court decision in Hudson v. Michigan, in which the Court narrowed the applicability of Fourth Amendment-based exclusionary rule, which generally states that evidence secured in violation of the Fourth Amendment guarantee against unreasonable search and seizures may not be used...
| Corporate Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
[publisher not identified],
2006.
|
| Series: | U.S. Congressional Research.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to the full text of this electronic book |
| Summary: | Discusses 2006 Supreme Court decision in Hudson v. Michigan, in which the Court narrowed the applicability of Fourth Amendment-based exclusionary rule, which generally states that evidence secured in violation of the Fourth Amendment guarantee against unreasonable search and seizures may not be used against the defendant in Federal or State criminal trials. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. CRS Report. Electronic resource. |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource. |