Obviousness Standard in Patent Law : KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
Reviews KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., in which the Supreme Court held that the "teaching, suggestion, or motivation" clause, if applied by U.S. District Courts and patent examiners as the sole means to determine the obviousness of an invention, violates the Patent Act and Supreme...
| Corporate Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
[publisher not identified],
2007.
|
| Series: | U.S. Congressional Research.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to the full text of this electronic book |
| Summary: | Reviews KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., in which the Supreme Court held that the "teaching, suggestion, or motivation" clause, if applied by U.S. District Courts and patent examiners as the sole means to determine the obviousness of an invention, violates the Patent Act and Supreme Court precedents that call for an expansive and flexible inquiry. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. CRS Report. Electronic resource. |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource. |