APA (7th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. Senate. Special Committee to Investigate Lobbying Activities & ProQuest (Firm). (1936). U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. William Randolph Hearst v. Hugo L. Black, Sherman Minton, Lewis B. Schwellenbach, Lynn J. Frazier, and Ernest W. Gibson, as Special Committee of U.S. Senate to Investigate Lobbying Activities, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C., Respondents. Objections to Allowance of Special Appeal. by Crampton Harris, Special Attorney for U.S. Senate Committee, under Special Appearance. [publisher not identified].

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. Senate. Special Committee to Investigate Lobbying Activities and ProQuest (Firm). U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. William Randolph Hearst V. Hugo L. Black, Sherman Minton, Lewis B. Schwellenbach, Lynn J. Frazier, and Ernest W. Gibson, as Special Committee of U.S. Senate to Investigate Lobbying Activities, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C., Respondents. Objections to Allowance of Special Appeal. by Crampton Harris, Special Attorney for U.S. Senate Committee, Under Special Appearance. [Place of publication not identified]: [publisher not identified], 1936.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. Senate. Special Committee to Investigate Lobbying Activities and ProQuest (Firm). U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. William Randolph Hearst V. Hugo L. Black, Sherman Minton, Lewis B. Schwellenbach, Lynn J. Frazier, and Ernest W. Gibson, as Special Committee of U.S. Senate to Investigate Lobbying Activities, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C., Respondents. Objections to Allowance of Special Appeal. by Crampton Harris, Special Attorney for U.S. Senate Committee, Under Special Appearance. [publisher not identified], 1936.