Securities Fraud : Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo.
Traces district court, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and Supreme Court rulings in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo, in which plaintiffs brought suit against Dura under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 claiming that the company knowingly defrauded investors by misrepresentin...
| Corporate Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
[publisher not identified],
2005.
|
| Series: | U.S. Congressional Research.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to the full text of this electronic book |
| Summary: | Traces district court, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and Supreme Court rulings in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo, in which plaintiffs brought suit against Dura under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 claiming that the company knowingly defrauded investors by misrepresenting the state of its business to investors. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. CRS Report. Electronic resource. |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource. |