APA (7th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Subcommittee on Employment, Safety, and Training, & ProQuest (Firm). (2000). Project labor agreements examined: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Employment, Safety, and Training of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, United States Senate, One Hundred Sixth Congress, second session, on examining if project labor agreements and their use of public funds are really in the best interest of taxpayers, June 5, 2000 (Irvine, CA). U.S. G.P.O..

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Subcommittee on Employment, Safety, and Training, and ProQuest (Firm). Project Labor Agreements Examined: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Employment, Safety, and Training of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, United States Senate, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Second Session, on Examining If Project Labor Agreements and Their Use of Public Funds Are Really in the Best Interest of Taxpayers, June 5, 2000 (Irvine, CA). Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2000.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Subcommittee on Employment, Safety, and Training, and ProQuest (Firm). Project Labor Agreements Examined: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Employment, Safety, and Training of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, United States Senate, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Second Session, on Examining If Project Labor Agreements and Their Use of Public Funds Are Really in the Best Interest of Taxpayers, June 5, 2000 (Irvine, CA). U.S. G.P.O., 2000.