APA (7th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. Subcommittee on Postal Operations and Services, ProQuest (Firm), & United States. Congress. House. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. Subcommittee on Postal Personnel and Modernization. (1984). A comparative review of optical character readers used in mail processing: Joint hearing before the Subcommittee on Postal Operations and Services and the Subcommittee on Postal Personnel and Modernization of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session, June 14, 1984. U.S. G.P.O..

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. Subcommittee on Postal Operations and Services, ProQuest (Firm), and United States. Congress. House. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. Subcommittee on Postal Personnel and Modernization. A Comparative Review of Optical Character Readers Used in Mail Processing: Joint Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Postal Operations and Services and the Subcommittee on Postal Personnel and Modernization of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, Second Session, June 14, 1984. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1984.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. Subcommittee on Postal Operations and Services, et al. A Comparative Review of Optical Character Readers Used in Mail Processing: Joint Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Postal Operations and Services and the Subcommittee on Postal Personnel and Modernization of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, Second Session, June 14, 1984. U.S. G.P.O., 1984.