APA (7th ed.) Citation

ProQuest (Firm). (1929). Indirect veto of an act of Congress. Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of the Okanogan Indian Tribe et al. vs. The United States sustaining the authority of the President of the United States to void legislation by withholding his signature after the adjournment of Congress. [publisher not identified].

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

ProQuest (Firm). Indirect Veto of an Act of Congress. Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Case of the Okanogan Indian Tribe Et Al. Vs. The United States Sustaining the Authority of the President of the United States to Void Legislation by Withholding His Signature After the Adjournment of Congress. Washington: [publisher not identified], 1929.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

ProQuest (Firm). Indirect Veto of an Act of Congress. Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Case of the Okanogan Indian Tribe Et Al. Vs. The United States Sustaining the Authority of the President of the United States to Void Legislation by Withholding His Signature After the Adjournment of Congress. [publisher not identified], 1929.