APA (7th ed.) Citation

ProQuest (Firm). (1922). Opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States in the cases of Railroad Commission of Wisconsin et al. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad and the State of New York and Charles D. Newton, personally and as Attorney General of the State of New York v. the United States and Edgar E. Clark et al. constituting the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Interveners Lehigh Valley Railroad Company and Railways in the State of New York. [publisher not identified].

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

ProQuest (Firm). Opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Cases of Railroad Commission of Wisconsin Et Al. V. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad and the State of New York and Charles D. Newton, Personally and as Attorney General of the State of New York V. the United States and Edgar E. Clark Et Al. Constituting the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Interveners Lehigh Valley Railroad Company and Railways in the State of New York. Washington: [publisher not identified], 1922.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

ProQuest (Firm). Opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Cases of Railroad Commission of Wisconsin Et Al. V. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad and the State of New York and Charles D. Newton, Personally and as Attorney General of the State of New York V. the United States and Edgar E. Clark Et Al. Constituting the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Interveners Lehigh Valley Railroad Company and Railways in the State of New York. [publisher not identified], 1922.

Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.