United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Printing & ProQuest (Firm). (1917). Eight-hour workday for railway employees. Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Francis M. Wilson, U.S. District Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, appellant, vs. Alexander New and Henry C. Ferris as receivers of the Missouri, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co., relative to the act to establish a uniform workday for railway employees, embracing both the concuring and dissenting opinions. [publisher not identified].
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Printing and ProQuest (Firm). Eight-hour Workday for Railway Employees. Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Case of Francis M. Wilson, U.S. District Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, Appellant, Vs. Alexander New and Henry C. Ferris as Receivers of the Missouri, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co., Relative to the Act to Establish a Uniform Workday for Railway Employees, Embracing Both the Concuring and Dissenting Opinions. Washington: [publisher not identified], 1917.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Printing and ProQuest (Firm). Eight-hour Workday for Railway Employees. Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Case of Francis M. Wilson, U.S. District Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, Appellant, Vs. Alexander New and Henry C. Ferris as Receivers of the Missouri, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co., Relative to the Act to Establish a Uniform Workday for Railway Employees, Embracing Both the Concuring and Dissenting Opinions. [publisher not identified], 1917.