| Tag |
First Indicator |
Second Indicator |
Subfields |
| LEADER |
00000cam a2200000Ka 4500 |
| 001 |
in00002783567 |
| 005 |
20150922145817.0 |
| 006 |
m fo d |
| 007 |
cr unu|||||||| |
| 008 |
121126s2012 txu obm 000 0 eng d |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)ocn819343519
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)819343519
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (TxCM)http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11610
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a TXA
|c TXA
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a TXAM
|
| 099 |
|
|
|a 2012
|a Dissertation
|a 1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11610
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Miller, Tyler.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Using subjective confidence to improve metacognitive monitoring accuracy and control.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a [College Station, Tex.] :
|b [Texas A&M University],
|c [2012]
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource.
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a "Major Subject: Psychology"
|
| 588 |
|
|
|a Description from author supplied metadata (automated record created 2012-10-22 13:24:58).
|
| 502 |
|
|
|b Doctor of Philosophy
|c Texas A&M University
|d 2012
|o http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11610
|
| 504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references.
|
| 516 |
|
|
|a Text (Dissertation)
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a Metacognition is defined as a person's awareness of the capabilities and vulnerabilities of their own cognition and also encompasses the actions that a person takes as a result of that awareness. The awareness and actions that a person takes are known as monitoring and control respectively. The relationship between accurate monitoring and improved control and performance has been borne out in multiple research studies. Unfortunately, people's metacognitive judgments are far from perfect; for low performers, that inaccuracy is most often in the form of overconfidence. Attempts to improve metacognitive monitoring and control have led to mixed results. The purpose of the experiments here was to examine whether participants could use confidence in their predictions to recalibrate subsequent performance predictions and to determine if improved metacognitive monitoring would confer benefits to metacognitive control. Would participants become less overconfident and would they then decide to study longer to improve performance? In three experiments, participants made predictions about their upcoming memory performance and reported their confidence that their predictions were accurate. Participants then adjusted their predictions so that they could be more confident the prediction was accurate. Experiment 1 served as a proof of concept - it established that confidence judgments could be used to improve metacognitive monitoring accuracy. Experiment 2 explored the boundary conditions of the calibration improvement effect. The results revealed that continuous improvement in performance predictions was possible after reporting confidence. And finally, Experiment 3 showed that participants' improved monitoring accuracy did not influence metacognitive control, which in this study was allocation of study time. One possible reason why reporting confidence did not affect metacognitive control was that participants required feedback about the benefits of confidence judgments before the improved calibration effect would influence their decisions to allocate study time. Future research will examine the influence of reporting confidence and other interventions to improve calibration and performance.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Electronic resource.
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Major Psychology.
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Metacognition
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Overconfidence
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Confidence
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Geraci, Lisa,
|e thesis advisor.
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11610
|z Link to OAK Trust copy
|t 0
|
| 948 |
|
|
|a cataloged
|b h
|c 2012/11/26
|d o
|e jstorlie
|f 2:21:45 pm
|
| 994 |
|
|
|a C0
|b TXA
|
| 999 |
|
|
|a MARS
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|s 7cec6e26-f661-3091-8c4c-63841821a8ef
|i 4e09c3fa-683f-3440-b436-bd909bf6a243
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|a Texas A&M University
|b College Station
|c Electronic Resources
|d Available Online
|t 0
|e 2012 Dissertation 1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11610
|h Other scheme
|
| 998 |
f |
f |
|a 2012 Dissertation 1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11610
|t 0
|l Available Online
|