The strategic logic of the contemporary security dilemma /

The reality and severity of the threats associated with contemporary transnational security problems indicate that the U.S. and its national and international partners need a new paradigm for the conduct of unconventional asymmetric conflict, and an accompanying new paradigm for strategic leader dev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Manwaring, Max G.
Corporate Author: Army War College (U.S.). Strategic Studies Institute
Format: Government Document eBook
Language:English
Published: Carlisle, PA : Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, [2011]
Series:SSI monograph.
Subjects:
Online Access:https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo15957

MARC

Tag First Indicator Second Indicator Subfields
LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 in00002740366
005 20211120163647.0
006 m d f
007 cr bn|||||||||
008 111202s2011 pau ob f000 0 eng c
020 |z 1584875143 
020 |z 9781584875147 
035 |a (OCoLC)ocn765883261 
040 |a AWC  |c AWC  |d GPO  |d MvI  |d UtOrBLW 
042 |a pcc 
049 |a WWW 
074 |a 0307-A-31 (online) 
086 0 |a D 101.146:SE 2/9 
100 1 |a Manwaring, Max G. 
245 1 4 |a The strategic logic of the contemporary security dilemma /  |c Max G. Manwaring. 
264 1 |a Carlisle, PA :  |b Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College,  |c [2011] 
300 |a 1 online resource (xi, 42 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Strategic Studies Institute monograph 
500 |a Title from PDF title page (viewed on December 2, 2011). 
500 |a "December 2011." 
520 |a The reality and severity of the threats associated with contemporary transnational security problems indicate that the U.S. and its national and international partners need a new paradigm for the conduct of unconventional asymmetric conflict, and an accompanying new paradigm for strategic leader development. The strategic-level basis of these new paradigms is found in the fact that the global community is redefining security in terms of nothing less than a reconceptualization of sovereignty. In the past, sovereignty was the acknowledged and/or real control of territory and the people in it. Now, sovereignty is the responsibility of governments to protect peoples' well-being and prevent great harm to those peoples. Thus, the security dilemma becomes, "Why, when, and how to intervene to protect people and prevent egregious human suffering?" We address some of the strategic-level questions and recommendations that arise out of that debate. We probably generate more questions than answers, but it is time to begin the strategic-level discussion. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 38-42). 
505 0 |a The security dilemma : past and present -- The development of the contemporary security dilemma concept -- Questions that arise out of the contemporary security dilemma -- Conclusions. 
500 |a Electronic resource. 
650 0 |a Irregular warfare. 
650 0 |a Internal security. 
650 0 |a Security, International. 
650 0 |a Strategy. 
710 2 |a Army War College (U.S.).  |b Strategic Studies Institute. 
830 0 |a SSI monograph. 
856 4 0 |u https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo15957  |t 0 
999 |a MARS 
999 f f |s e1e0c254-cd26-3c4a-a9bc-08bee8cc7cbd  |i 51bc64c9-3a62-3da9-894a-dd9cd2eb28b8  |t 0 
952 f f |a Texas A&M University  |b College Station  |c Electronic Resources  |d Available Online  |t 0  |e D 101.146:SE 2/9  |h Superintendent of Documents classification 
998 f f |a D 101.146:SE 2/9  |t 0  |l Available Online