APA (7th ed.) Citation

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation & U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. (2004). Use of less than optimal bounding assumptions in criticality safety analysis at fuel cycle facilities. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation : U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. Use of Less than Optimal Bounding Assumptions in Criticality Safety Analysis at Fuel Cycle Facilities. Washington, D.C: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation : U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, 2004.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. Use of Less than Optimal Bounding Assumptions in Criticality Safety Analysis at Fuel Cycle Facilities. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation : U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, 2004.

Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.