APA (7th ed.) Citation

Whitaker, E. The ignoramus justices: Being an answer to the order of sessions at Hick's-Hall, bearing date the 13th of January, 1681, wherein it plainly appears the said order is against law : also a short account of all the acts that relate to Protestant dissenters at this day in force against them ... : and also an account of such acts as are in force against popish recusants ... : and hereunto is also added a brief account of the penalties and forfeitures of those acts ...

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Whitaker, Edward. The Ignoramus Justices: Being an Answer to the Order of Sessions at Hick's-Hall, Bearing Date the 13th of January, 1681, Wherein It Plainly Appears the Said Order Is Against Law : Also a Short Account of All the Acts That Relate to Protestant Dissenters at This Day in Force Against Them ... : And Also an Account of Such Acts as Are in Force Against Popish Recusants ... : And Hereunto Is Also Added a Brief Account of the Penalties and Forfeitures of Those Acts ...

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Whitaker, Edward. The Ignoramus Justices: Being an Answer to the Order of Sessions at Hick's-Hall, Bearing Date the 13th of January, 1681, Wherein It Plainly Appears the Said Order Is Against Law : Also a Short Account of All the Acts That Relate to Protestant Dissenters at This Day in Force Against Them ... : And Also an Account of Such Acts as Are in Force Against Popish Recusants ... : And Hereunto Is Also Added a Brief Account of the Penalties and Forfeitures of Those Acts ...