Chalmers, D. (1768). In the process of furthcoming, David Chalmers, butcher in Dalkeith, pursuer; against Grizel Dalrymple, spouse to Daniel Rae candlemaker there, and others, defenders. The following condescendence for the pursuer, answers thereto, and counter-condescendence for the defender Grizel Dalrymple, and proof adduced for both parties, are printed and put in the Lords boxes; together with informations thereon for either party, in obedience to an interlocutor of Lord Stonefield's. Condescendence. [publisher not identified].
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationChalmers, David. In the Process of Furthcoming, David Chalmers, Butcher in Dalkeith, Pursuer; Against Grizel Dalrymple, Spouse to Daniel Rae Candlemaker There, and Others, Defenders. The Following Condescendence for the Pursuer, Answers Thereto, and Counter-condescendence for the Defender Grizel Dalrymple, and Proof Adduced for Both Parties, Are Printed and Put in the Lords Boxes; Together with Informations Thereon for Either Party, in Obedience to an Interlocutor of Lord Stonefield's. Condescendence. [Edinburgh]: [publisher not identified], 1768.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationChalmers, David. In the Process of Furthcoming, David Chalmers, Butcher in Dalkeith, Pursuer; Against Grizel Dalrymple, Spouse to Daniel Rae Candlemaker There, and Others, Defenders. The Following Condescendence for the Pursuer, Answers Thereto, and Counter-condescendence for the Defender Grizel Dalrymple, and Proof Adduced for Both Parties, Are Printed and Put in the Lords Boxes; Together with Informations Thereon for Either Party, in Obedience to an Interlocutor of Lord Stonefield's. Condescendence. [publisher not identified], 1768.